Apparatus and method for efficient call/return emulation using a dual return stack buffer

ABSTRACT

An apparatus and method for a dual return stack buffer (RSB) for use in binary translation systems. An embodiment of a processor includes: a dual return stack buffer (DRSB) comprising a native RSB and an extended RSB (XRSB), the dual RSB to be used within a binary translation execution environment in which guest call-return instruction sequences are translated to native call-return instruction sequences to be executed directly by the processor; the native RSB to store native return addresses associated with the native call-return instruction sequences; and the XRSB to store emulated return addresses associated with the guest call-return instruction sequences, wherein each native return address stored in the RSB is associated with an emulated return address stored in the XRSB.

BACKGROUND

Field of the Invention

This invention relates generally to the field of computer processors. More particularly, the invention relates to a method and apparatus for efficient call/return emulation using a dual return stack buffer (RSB).

Description of the Related Art

An instruction set, or instruction set architecture (ISA), is the part of the computer architecture related to programming, including the native data types, instructions, register architecture, addressing modes, memory architecture, interrupt and exception handling, and external input and output (I/O). It should be noted that the term “instruction” generally refers herein to macro-instructions—that is instructions that are provided to the processor for execution—as opposed to micro-instructions or micro-ops—that is the result of a processor's decoder decoding macro-instructions. The micro-instructions or micro-ops can be configured to instruct an execution unit on the processor to perform operations to implement the logic associated with the macro-instruction.

The ISA is distinguished from the microarchitecture, which is the set of processor design techniques used to implement the instruction set. Processors with different microarchitectures can share a common instruction set. For example, Intel® Pentium 4 processors, Intel® Core™ processors, and processors from Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. of Sunnyvale Calif. implement nearly identical versions of the x86 instruction set (with some extensions that have been added with newer versions), but have different internal designs. For example, the same register architecture of the ISA may be implemented in different ways in different microarchitectures using well-known techniques, including dedicated physical registers, one or more dynamically allocated physical registers using a register renaming mechanism (e.g., the use of a Register Alias Table (RAT), a Reorder Buffer (ROB) and a retirement register file). Unless otherwise specified, the phrases register architecture, register file, and register are used herein to refer to that which is visible to the software/programmer and the manner in which instructions specify registers. Where a distinction is required, the adjective “logical,” “architectural,” or “software visible” will be used to indicate registers/files in the register architecture, while different adjectives will be used to designate registers in a given microarchitecture (e.g., physical register, reorder buffer, retirement register, register pool).

An instruction set includes one or more instruction formats. A given instruction format defines various fields (number of bits, location of bits) to specify, among other things, the operation to be performed and the operand(s) on which that operation is to be performed. Some instruction formats are further broken down though the definition of instruction templates (or subformats). For example, the instruction templates of a given instruction format may be defined to have different subsets of the instruction format's fields (the included fields are typically in the same order, but at least some have different bit positions because there are less fields included) and/or defined to have a given field interpreted differently. A given instruction is expressed using a given instruction format (and, if defined, in a given one of the instruction templates of that instruction format) and specifies the operation and the operands. An instruction stream is a specific sequence of instructions, where each instruction in the sequence is an occurrence of an instruction in an instruction format (and, if defined, a given one of the instruction templates of that instruction format).

In order for a pipelined microprocessor to operate efficiently, an instruction fetch unit at the head of the pipeline must continually provide the pipeline with a stream of microprocessor instructions. However, conditional branch instructions within an instruction stream prevent the instruction fetch unit from fetching subsequent instructions until the branch condition is fully resolved. In a pipelined microprocessor, the branch condition will not be fully resolved until the branch instruction reaches an instruction execution stage near the end of the microprocessor pipeline. Accordingly, the instruction fetch unit will stall because the unresolved branch condition prevents the instruction fetch unit from knowing which instructions to fetch next.

To alleviate this problem, many pipelined microprocessors use branch prediction mechanisms that predict the existence and the outcome of branch instructions within an instruction stream. The instruction fetch unit uses the branch predictions to fetch subsequent instructions. When a branch prediction mechanism predicts the outcome of a branch instruction and the microprocessor executes subsequent instructions along the predicted path, the microprocessor is said to have “speculatively executed” along the predicted instruction path. During speculative execution the microprocessor is performing useful processing only if the branch instruction was predicted correctly.

However, if the branch prediction mechanism mis-predicted the branch instruction, the microprocessor is executing instructions down the wrong path and therefore accomplishes nothing. When the microprocessor eventually detects the mis-predicted branch, the microprocessor must flush the instructions that were speculatively fetched from the instruction pipeline and restart execution at the correct address.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

A better understanding of the present invention can be obtained from the following detailed description in conjunction with the following drawings, in which:

FIGS. 1A and 1B are block diagrams illustrating a generic vector friendly instruction format and instruction templates thereof according to embodiments of the invention;

FIG. 2A-D is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary specific vector friendly instruction format according to embodiments of the invention;

FIG. 3 is a block diagram of a register architecture according to one embodiment of the invention; and

FIG. 4A is a block diagram illustrating both an exemplary in-order fetch, decode, retire pipeline and an exemplary register renaming, out-of-order issue/execution pipeline according to embodiments of the invention;

FIG. 4B is a block diagram illustrating both an exemplary embodiment of an in-order fetch, decode, retire core and an exemplary register renaming, out-of-order issue/execution architecture core to be included in a processor according to embodiments of the invention;

FIG. 5A is a block diagram of a single processor core, along with its connection to an on-die interconnect network;

FIG. 5B illustrates an expanded view of part of the processor core in FIG. 5A according to embodiments of the invention;

FIG. 6 is a block diagram of a single core processor and a multicore processor with integrated memory controller and graphics according to embodiments of the invention;

FIG. 7 illustrates a block diagram of a system in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 8 illustrates a block diagram of a second system in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 9 illustrates a block diagram of a third system in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 10 illustrates a block diagram of a system on a chip (SoC) in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 11 illustrates a block diagram contrasting the use of a software instruction converter to convert binary instructions in a source instruction set to binary instructions in a target instruction set according to embodiments of the invention;

FIG. 12 illustrates an exemplary processor on which embodiments of the invention may be implemented;

FIGS. 13A-B illustrate an exemplary dual return stack buffer (RSB) in accordance with one embodiment of the invention;

FIG. 14 illustrates an exemplary call and return sequence;

FIG. 15 illustrates a scenario in which the program code functions are in different 4 KB memory pages;

FIG. 16 illustrates a scenario in which the original call and return instructions cross a 4 GB boundary;

FIG. 17 illustrates an exemplary state of the dual RSB as the instructions for the simple same page scenario execute;

FIG. 18 illustrates an exemplary scenario where a memory page is crossed; and

FIG. 19 illustrates an exemplary scenario in which the return addresses do not match.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

In the following description, for the purposes of explanation, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the embodiments of the invention described below. It will be apparent, however, to one skilled in the art that the embodiments of the invention may be practiced without some of these specific details. In other instances, well-known structures and devices are shown in block diagram form to avoid obscuring the underlying principles of the embodiments of the invention.

Exemplary Processor Architectures and Data Types

An instruction set includes one or more instruction formats. A given instruction format defines various fields (number of bits, location of bits) to specify, among other things, the operation to be performed (opcode) and the operand(s) on which that operation is to be performed. Some instruction formats are further broken down though the definition of instruction templates (or subformats). For example, the instruction templates of a given instruction format may be defined to have different subsets of the instruction format's fields (the included fields are typically in the same order, but at least some have different bit positions because there are less fields included) and/or defined to have a given field interpreted differently. Thus, each instruction of an ISA is expressed using a given instruction format (and, if defined, in a given one of the instruction templates of that instruction format) and includes fields for specifying the operation and the operands. For example, an exemplary ADD instruction has a specific opcode and an instruction format that includes an opcode field to specify that opcode and operand fields to select operands (source1/destination and source2); and an occurrence of this ADD instruction in an instruction stream will have specific contents in the operand fields that select specific operands. A set of SIMD extensions referred to the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) (AVX1 and AVX2) and using the Vector Extensions (VEX) coding scheme, has been, has been released and/or published (e.g., see Intel® 64 and IA-32 Architectures Software Developers Manual, October 2011; and see Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions Programming Reference, June 2011).

Exemplary Instruction Formats

Embodiments of the instruction(s) described herein may be embodied in different formats. Additionally, exemplary systems, architectures, and pipelines are detailed below. Embodiments of the instruction(s) may be executed on such systems, architectures, and pipelines, but are not limited to those detailed.

A. Generic Vector Friendly Instruction Format

A vector friendly instruction format is an instruction format that is suited for vector instructions (e.g., there are certain fields specific to vector operations). While embodiments are described in which both vector and scalar operations are supported through the vector friendly instruction format, alternative embodiments use only vector operations the vector friendly instruction format.

FIGS. 1A-1B are block diagrams illustrating a generic vector friendly instruction format and instruction templates thereof according to embodiments of the invention. FIG. 1A is a block diagram illustrating a generic vector friendly instruction format and class A instruction templates thereof according to embodiments of the invention; while FIG. 1B is a block diagram illustrating the generic vector friendly instruction format and class B instruction templates thereof according to embodiments of the invention. Specifically, a generic vector friendly instruction format 100 for which are defined class A and class B instruction templates, both of which include no memory access 105 instruction templates and memory access 120 instruction templates. The term generic in the context of the vector friendly instruction format refers to the instruction format not being tied to any specific instruction set.

While embodiments of the invention will be described in which the vector friendly instruction format supports the following: a 64 byte vector operand length (or size) with 32 bit (4 byte) or 64 bit (8 byte) data element widths (or sizes) (and thus, a 64 byte vector consists of either 16 doubleword-size elements or alternatively, 8 quadword-size elements); a 64 byte vector operand length (or size) with 16 bit (2 byte) or 8 bit (1 byte) data element widths (or sizes); a 32 byte vector operand length (or size) with 32 bit (4 byte), 64 bit (8 byte), 16 bit (2 byte), or 8 bit (1 byte) data element widths (or sizes); and a 16 byte vector operand length (or size) with 32 bit (4 byte), 64 bit (8 byte), 16 bit (2 byte), or 8 bit (1 byte) data element widths (or sizes); alternative embodiments may support more, less and/or different vector operand sizes (e.g., 256 byte vector operands) with more, less, or different data element widths (e.g., 128 bit (16 byte) data element widths).

The class A instruction templates in FIG. 1A include: 1) within the no memory access 105 instruction templates there is shown a no memory access, full round control type operation 110 instruction template and a no memory access, data transform type operation 115 instruction template; and 2) within the memory access 120 instruction templates there is shown a memory access, temporal 125 instruction template and a memory access, non-temporal 130 instruction template. The class B instruction templates in FIG. 1B include: 1) within the no memory access 105 instruction templates there is shown a no memory access, write mask control, partial round control type operation 112 instruction template and a no memory access, write mask control, vsize type operation 117 instruction template; and 2) within the memory access 120 instruction templates there is shown a memory access, write mask control 127 instruction template.

The generic vector friendly instruction format 100 includes the following fields listed below in the order illustrated in FIGS. 1A-1B.

Format field 140—a specific value (an instruction format identifier value) in this field uniquely identifies the vector friendly instruction format, and thus occurrences of instructions in the vector friendly instruction format in instruction streams. As such, this field is optional in the sense that it is not needed for an instruction set that has only the generic vector friendly instruction format.

Base operation field 142—its content distinguishes different base operations.

Register index field 144—its content, directly or through address generation, specifies the locations of the source and destination operands, be they in registers or in memory. These include a sufficient number of bits to select N registers from a P×Q (e.g. 32×512, 16×128, 32×1024, 64×1024) register file. While in one embodiment N may be up to three sources and one destination register, alternative embodiments may support more or less sources and destination registers (e.g., may support up to two sources where one of these sources also acts as the destination, may support up to three sources where one of these sources also acts as the destination, may support up to two sources and one destination).

Modifier field 146—its content distinguishes occurrences of instructions in the generic vector instruction format that specify memory access from those that do not; that is, between no memory access 105 instruction templates and memory access 120 instruction templates. Memory access operations read and/or write to the memory hierarchy (in some cases specifying the source and/or destination addresses using values in registers), while non-memory access operations do not (e.g., the source and destinations are registers). While in one embodiment this field also selects between three different ways to perform memory address calculations, alternative embodiments may support more, less, or different ways to perform memory address calculations.

Augmentation operation field 150—its content distinguishes which one of a variety of different operations to be performed in addition to the base operation. This field is context specific. In one embodiment of the invention, this field is divided into a class field 168, an alpha field 152, and a beta field 154. The augmentation operation field 150 allows common groups of operations to be performed in a single instruction rather than 2, 3, or 4 instructions.

Scale field 160—its content allows for the scaling of the index field's content for memory address generation (e.g., for address generation that uses 2^(scale)*index+base).

Displacement Field 162A—its content is used as part of memory address generation (e.g., for address generation that uses 2^(scale)*index+base+displacement).

Displacement Factor Field 162B (note that the juxtaposition of displacement field 162A directly over displacement factor field 162B indicates one or the other is used)—its content is used as part of address generation; it specifies a displacement factor that is to be scaled by the size of a memory access (N)—where N is the number of bytes in the memory access (e.g., for address generation that uses 2^(scale)*index+base+scaled displacement). Redundant low-order bits are ignored and hence, the displacement factor field's content is multiplied by the memory operands total size (N) in order to generate the final displacement to be used in calculating an effective address. The value of N is determined by the processor hardware at runtime based on the full opcode field 174 (described later herein) and the data manipulation field 154C. The displacement field 162A and the displacement factor field 162B are optional in the sense that they are not used for the no memory access 105 instruction templates and/or different embodiments may implement only one or none of the two.

Data element width field 164—its content distinguishes which one of a number of data element widths is to be used (in some embodiments for all instructions; in other embodiments for only some of the instructions). This field is optional in the sense that it is not needed if only one data element width is supported and/or data element widths are supported using some aspect of the opcodes.

Write mask field 170—its content controls, on a per data element position basis, whether that data element position in the destination vector operand reflects the result of the base operation and augmentation operation. Class A instruction templates support merging-writemasking, while class B instruction templates support both merging- and zeroing-writemasking. When merging, vector masks allow any set of elements in the destination to be protected from updates during the execution of any operation (specified by the base operation and the augmentation operation); in other one embodiment, preserving the old value of each element of the destination where the corresponding mask bit has a 0. In contrast, when zeroing vector masks allow any set of elements in the destination to be zeroed during the execution of any operation (specified by the base operation and the augmentation operation); in one embodiment, an element of the destination is set to 0 when the corresponding mask bit has a 0 value. A subset of this functionality is the ability to control the vector length of the operation being performed (that is, the span of elements being modified, from the first to the last one); however, it is not necessary that the elements that are modified be consecutive. Thus, the write mask field 170 allows for partial vector operations, including loads, stores, arithmetic, logical, etc. While embodiments of the invention are described in which the write mask field's 170 content selects one of a number of write mask registers that contains the write mask to be used (and thus the write mask field's 170 content indirectly identifies that masking to be performed), alternative embodiments instead or additional allow the mask write field's 170 content to directly specify the masking to be performed.

Immediate field 172—its content allows for the specification of an immediate. This field is optional in the sense that is it not present in an implementation of the generic vector friendly format that does not support immediate and it is not present in instructions that do not use an immediate.

Class field 168—its content distinguishes between different classes of instructions. With reference to FIGS. 1A-B, the contents of this field select between class A and class B instructions. In FIGS. 1A-B, rounded corner squares are used to indicate a specific value is present in a field (e.g., class A 168A and class B 168B for the class field 168 respectively in FIGS. 1A-B).

Instruction Templates of Class A

In the case of the non-memory access 105 instruction templates of class A, the alpha field 152 is interpreted as an RS field 152A, whose content distinguishes which one of the different augmentation operation types are to be performed (e.g., round 152A.1 and data transform 152A.2 are respectively specified for the no memory access, round type operation 110 and the no memory access, data transform type operation 115 instruction templates), while the beta field 154 distinguishes which of the operations of the specified type is to be performed. In the no memory access 105 instruction templates, the scale field 160, the displacement field 162A, and the displacement scale field 162B are not present.

No-Memory Access Instruction Templates—Full Round Control Type Operation

In the no memory access full round control type operation 110 instruction template, the beta field 154 is interpreted as a round control field 154A, whose content(s) provide static rounding. While in the described embodiments of the invention the round control field 154A includes a suppress all floating point exceptions (SAE) field 156 and a round operation control field 158, alternative embodiments may support may encode both these concepts into the same field or only have one or the other of these concepts/fields (e.g., may have only the round operation control field 158).

SAE field 156—its content distinguishes whether or not to disable the exception event reporting; when the SAE field's 156 content indicates suppression is enabled, a given instruction does not report any kind of floating-point exception flag and does not raise any floating point exception handler.

Round operation control field 158—its content distinguishes which one of a group of rounding operations to perform (e.g., Round-up, Round-down, Round-towards-zero and Round-to-nearest). Thus, the round operation control field 158 allows for the changing of the rounding mode on a per instruction basis. In one embodiment of the invention where a processor includes a control register for specifying rounding modes, the round operation control field's 150 content overrides that register value.

No Memory Access Instruction Templates—Data Transform Type Operation

In the no memory access data transform type operation 115 instruction template, the beta field 154 is interpreted as a data transform field 154B, whose content distinguishes which one of a number of data transforms is to be performed (e.g., no data transform, swizzle, broadcast).

In the case of a memory access 120 instruction template of class A, the alpha field 152 is interpreted as an eviction hint field 152B, whose content distinguishes which one of the eviction hints is to be used (in FIG. 1A, temporal 152B.1 and non-temporal 152B.2 are respectively specified for the memory access, temporal 125 instruction template and the memory access, non-temporal 130 instruction template), while the beta field 154 is interpreted as a data manipulation field 154C, whose content distinguishes which one of a number of data manipulation operations (also known as primitives) is to be performed (e.g., no manipulation; broadcast; up conversion of a source; and down conversion of a destination). The memory access 120 instruction templates include the scale field 160, and optionally the displacement field 162A or the displacement scale field 162B.

Vector memory instructions perform vector loads from and vector stores to memory, with conversion support. As with regular vector instructions, vector memory instructions transfer data from/to memory in a data element-wise fashion, with the elements that are actually transferred is dictated by the contents of the vector mask that is selected as the write mask.

Memory Access Instruction Templates—Temporal

Temporal data is data likely to be reused soon enough to benefit from caching. This is, however, a hint, and different processors may implement it in different ways, including ignoring the hint entirely.

Memory Access Instruction Templates—Non-Temporal

Non-temporal data is data unlikely to be reused soon enough to benefit from caching in the 1st-level cache and should be given priority for eviction. This is, however, a hint, and different processors may implement it in different ways, including ignoring the hint entirely.

Instruction Templates of Class B

In the case of the instruction templates of class B, the alpha field 152 is interpreted as a write mask control (Z) field 152C, whose content distinguishes whether the write masking controlled by the write mask field 170 should be a merging or a zeroing.

In the case of the non-memory access 105 instruction templates of class B, part of the beta field 154 is interpreted as an RL field 157A, whose content distinguishes which one of the different augmentation operation types are to be performed (e.g., round 157A.1 and vector length (VSIZE) 157A.2 are respectively specified for the no memory access, write mask control, partial round control type operation 112 instruction template and the no memory access, write mask control, VSIZE type operation 117 instruction template), while the rest of the beta field 154 distinguishes which of the operations of the specified type is to be performed. In the no memory access 105 instruction templates, the scale field 160, the displacement field 162A, and the displacement scale field 162B are not present.

In the no memory access, write mask control, partial round control type operation 110 instruction template, the rest of the beta field 154 is interpreted as a round operation field 159A and exception event reporting is disabled (a given instruction does not report any kind of floating-point exception flag and does not raise any floating point exception handler).

Round operation control field 159A—just as round operation control field 158, its content distinguishes which one of a group of rounding operations to perform (e.g., Round-up, Round-down, Round-towards-zero and Round-to-nearest). Thus, the round operation control field 159A allows for the changing of the rounding mode on a per instruction basis. In one embodiment of the invention where a processor includes a control register for specifying rounding modes, the round operation control field's 150 content overrides that register value.

In the no memory access, write mask control, VSIZE type operation 117 instruction template, the rest of the beta field 154 is interpreted as a vector length field 159B, whose content distinguishes which one of a number of data vector lengths is to be performed on (e.g., 128, 256, or 512 byte).

In the case of a memory access 120 instruction template of class B, part of the beta field 154 is interpreted as a broadcast field 157B, whose content distinguishes whether or not the broadcast type data manipulation operation is to be performed, while the rest of the beta field 154 is interpreted the vector length field 159B. The memory access 120 instruction templates include the scale field 160, and optionally the displacement field 162A or the displacement scale field 162B.

With regard to the generic vector friendly instruction format 100, a full opcode field 174 is shown including the format field 140, the base operation field 142, and the data element width field 164. While one embodiment is shown where the full opcode field 174 includes all of these fields, the full opcode field 174 includes less than all of these fields in embodiments that do not support all of them. The full opcode field 174 provides the operation code (opcode).

The augmentation operation field 150, the data element width field 164, and the write mask field 170 allow these features to be specified on a per instruction basis in the generic vector friendly instruction format.

The combination of write mask field and data element width field create typed instructions in that they allow the mask to be applied based on different data element widths.

The various instruction templates found within class A and class B are beneficial in different situations. In some embodiments of the invention, different processors or different cores within a processor may support only class A, only class B, or both classes. For instance, a high performance general purpose out-of-order core intended for general-purpose computing may support only class B, a core intended primarily for graphics and/or scientific (throughput) computing may support only class A, and a core intended for both may support both (of course, a core that has some mix of templates and instructions from both classes but not all templates and instructions from both classes is within the purview of the invention). Also, a single processor may include multiple cores, all of which support the same class or in which different cores support different class. For instance, in a processor with separate graphics and general purpose cores, one of the graphics cores intended primarily for graphics and/or scientific computing may support only class A, while one or more of the general purpose cores may be high performance general purpose cores with out of order execution and register renaming intended for general-purpose computing that support only class B. Another processor that does not have a separate graphics core, may include one more general purpose in-order or out-of-order cores that support both class A and class B. Of course, features from one class may also be implement in the other class in different embodiments of the invention. Programs written in a high level language would be put (e.g., just in time compiled or statically compiled) into an variety of different executable forms, including: 1) a form having only instructions of the class(es) supported by the target processor for execution; or 2) a form having alternative routines written using different combinations of the instructions of all classes and having control flow code that selects the routines to execute based on the instructions supported by the processor which is currently executing the code.

B. Exemplary Specific Vector Friendly Instruction Format

FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary specific vector friendly instruction format according to embodiments of the invention. FIG. 2 shows a specific vector friendly instruction format 200 that is specific in the sense that it specifies the location, size, interpretation, and order of the fields, as well as values for some of those fields. The specific vector friendly instruction format 200 may be used to extend the x86 instruction set, and thus some of the fields are similar or the same as those used in the existing x86 instruction set and extension thereof (e.g., AVX). This format remains consistent with the prefix encoding field, real opcode byte field, MOD R/M field, SIB field, displacement field, and immediate fields of the existing x86 instruction set with extensions. The fields from FIG. 1 into which the fields from FIG. 2 map are illustrated.

It should be understood that, although embodiments of the invention are described with reference to the specific vector friendly instruction format 200 in the context of the generic vector friendly instruction format 100 for illustrative purposes, the invention is not limited to the specific vector friendly instruction format 200 except where claimed. For example, the generic vector friendly instruction format 100 contemplates a variety of possible sizes for the various fields, while the specific vector friendly instruction format 200 is shown as having fields of specific sizes. By way of specific example, while the data element width field 164 is illustrated as a one bit field in the specific vector friendly instruction format 200, the invention is not so limited (that is, the generic vector friendly instruction format 100 contemplates other sizes of the data element width field 164).

The generic vector friendly instruction format 100 includes the following fields listed below in the order illustrated in FIG. 2A.

EVEX Prefix (Bytes 0-3) 202—is encoded in a four-byte form.

Format Field 140 (EVEX Byte 0, bits [7:0])—the first byte (EVEX Byte 0) is the format field 140 and it contains 0x62 (the unique value used for distinguishing the vector friendly instruction format in one embodiment of the invention).

The second-fourth bytes (EVEX Bytes 1-3) include a number of bit fields providing specific capability.

REX field 205 (EVEX Byte 1, bits [7-5])—consists of a EVEX.R bit field (EVEX Byte 1, bit [7]-R), EVEX.X bit field (EVEX byte 1, bit [6]-X), and 157BEX byte 1, bit[5]-B). The EVEX.R, EVEX.X, and EVEX.B bit fields provide the same functionality as the corresponding VEX bit fields, and are encoded using 1s complement form, i.e. ZMM0 is encoded as 1111B, ZMM15 is encoded as 0000B. Other fields of the instructions encode the lower three bits of the register indexes as is known in the art (rrr, xxx, and bbb), so that Rrrr, Xxxx, and Bbbb may be formed by adding EVEX.R, EVEX.X, and EVEX.B.

REX′ field 110—this is the first part of the REX′ field 110 and is the EVEX.R′ bit field (EVEX Byte 1, bit [4]-R′) that is used to encode either the upper 16 or lower 16 of the extended 32 register set. In one embodiment of the invention, this bit, along with others as indicated below, is stored in bit inverted format to distinguish (in the well-known x86 32-bit mode) from the BOUND instruction, whose real opcode byte is 62, but does not accept in the MOD R/M field (described below) the value of 11 in the MOD field; alternative embodiments of the invention do not store this and the other indicated bits below in the inverted format. A value of 1 is used to encode the lower 16 registers. In other words, R′Rrrr is formed by combining EVEX.R′, EVEX.R, and the other RRR from other fields.

Opcode map field 215 (EVEX byte 1, bits [3:0]-mmmm)—its content encodes an implied leading opcode byte (0F, 0F 38, or 0F 3).

Data element width field 164 (EVEX byte 2, bit [7]-W)—is represented by the notation EVEX.W. EVEX.W is used to define the granularity (size) of the datatype (either 32-bit data elements or 64-bit data elements).

EVEX.vvvv 220 (EVEX Byte 2, bits [6:3]-vvvv)—the role of EVEX.vvvv may include the following: 1) EVEX.vvvv encodes the first source register operand, specified in inverted (1s complement) form and is valid for instructions with 2 or more source operands; 2) EVEX.vvvv encodes the destination register operand, specified in 1s complement form for certain vector shifts; or 3) EVEX.vvvv does not encode any operand, the field is reserved and should contain 1111b. Thus, EVEX.vvvv field 220 encodes the 4 low-order bits of the first source register specifier stored in inverted (1s complement) form. Depending on the instruction, an extra different EVEX bit field is used to extend the specifier size to 32 registers.

EVEX.U 168 Class field (EVEX byte 2, bit [2]-U)—If EVEX.U=0, it indicates class A or EVEX.U0; if EVEX.0=1, it indicates class B or EVEX.U1.

Prefix encoding field 225 (EVEX byte 2, bits [1:0]-pp)—provides additional bits for the base operation field. In addition to providing support for the legacy SSE instructions in the EVEX prefix format, this also has the benefit of compacting the SIMD prefix (rather than requiring a byte to express the SIMD prefix, the EVEX prefix requires only 2 bits). In one embodiment, to support legacy SSE instructions that use a SIMD prefix (66H, F2H, F3H) in both the legacy format and in the EVEX prefix format, these legacy SIMD prefixes are encoded into the SIMD prefix encoding field; and at runtime are expanded into the legacy SIMD prefix prior to being provided to the decoder's PLA (so the PLA can execute both the legacy and EVEX format of these legacy instructions without modification). Although newer instructions could use the EVEX prefix encoding field's content directly as an opcode extension, certain embodiments expand in a similar fashion for consistency but allow for different meanings to be specified by these legacy SIMD prefixes. An alternative embodiment may redesign the PLA to support the 2 bit SIMD prefix encodings, and thus not require the expansion.

Alpha field 152 (EVEX byte 3, bit [7]-EH; also known as EVEX.EH, EVEX.rs, EVEX.RL, EVEX.write mask control, and EVEX.N; also illustrated with α)—as previously described, this field is context specific.

Beta field 154 (EVEX byte 3, bits [6:4]-SSS, also known as EVEX.s₂₋₀, EVEX.r₂₋₀, EVEX.rr1, EVEX.LL0, EVEX.LLB; also illustrated with βββ)—as previously described, this field is context specific.

REX′ field 110—this is the remainder of the REX′ field and is the EVEX.V′ bit field (EVEX Byte 3, bit [3]-V′) that may be used to encode either the upper 16 or lower 16 of the extended 32 register set. This bit is stored in bit inverted format. A value of 1 is used to encode the lower 16 registers. In other words, V′VVVV is formed by combining EVEX.V′, EVEX.vvvv.

Write mask field 170 (EVEX byte 3, bits [2:0]-kkk)—its content specifies the index of a register in the write mask registers as previously described. In one embodiment of the invention, the specific value EVEX.kkk=000 has a special behavior implying no write mask is used for the particular instruction (this may be implemented in a variety of ways including the use of a write mask hardwired to all ones or hardware that bypasses the masking hardware).

Real Opcode Field 230 (Byte 4) is also known as the opcode byte. Part of the opcode is specified in this field.

MOD R/M Field 240 (Byte 5) includes MOD field 242, Reg field 244, and R/M field 246. As previously described, the MOD field's 242 content distinguishes between memory access and non-memory access operations. The role of Reg field 244 can be summarized to two situations: encoding either the destination register operand or a source register operand, or be treated as an opcode extension and not used to encode any instruction operand. The role of R/M field 246 may include the following: encoding the instruction operand that references a memory address, or encoding either the destination register operand or a source register operand.

Scale, Index, Base (SIB) Byte (Byte 6)—As previously described, the scale field's 150 content is used for memory address generation. SIB.xxx 254 and SIB.bbb 256—the contents of these fields have been previously referred to with regard to the register indexes Xxxx and Bbbb.

Displacement field 162A (Bytes 7-10)—when MOD field 242 contains 10, bytes 7-10 are the displacement field 162A, and it works the same as the legacy 32-bit displacement (disp32) and works at byte granularity.

Displacement factor field 162B (Byte 7)—when MOD field 242 contains 01, byte 7 is the displacement factor field 162B. The location of this field is that same as that of the legacy x86 instruction set 8-bit displacement (disp8), which works at byte granularity. Since disp8 is sign extended, it can only address between −128 and 127 bytes offsets; in terms of 64 byte cache lines, disp8 uses 8 bits that can be set to only four really useful values −128, −64, 0, and 64; since a greater range is often needed, disp32 is used; however, disp32 requires 4 bytes. In contrast to disp8 and disp32, the displacement factor field 162B is a reinterpretation of disp8; when using displacement factor field 162B, the actual displacement is determined by the content of the displacement factor field multiplied by the size of the memory operand access (N). This type of displacement is referred to as disp8*N. This reduces the average instruction length (a single byte of used for the displacement but with a much greater range). Such compressed displacement is based on the assumption that the effective displacement is multiple of the granularity of the memory access, and hence, the redundant low-order bits of the address offset do not need to be encoded. In other words, the displacement factor field 162B substitutes the legacy x86 instruction set 8-bit displacement. Thus, the displacement factor field 162B is encoded the same way as an x86 instruction set 8-bit displacement (so no changes in the ModRM/SIB encoding rules) with the only exception that disp8 is overloaded to disp8*N. In other words, there are no changes in the encoding rules or encoding lengths but only in the interpretation of the displacement value by hardware (which needs to scale the displacement by the size of the memory operand to obtain a byte-wise address offset).

Immediate field 172 operates as previously described.

Full Opcode Field

FIG. 2B is a block diagram illustrating the fields of the specific vector friendly instruction format 200 that make up the full opcode field 174 according to one embodiment of the invention. Specifically, the full opcode field 174 includes the format field 140, the base operation field 142, and the data element width (W) field 164. The base operation field 142 includes the prefix encoding field 225, the opcode map field 215, and the real opcode field 230.

Register Index Field

FIG. 2C is a block diagram illustrating the fields of the specific vector friendly instruction format 200 that make up the register index field 144 according to one embodiment of the invention. Specifically, the register index field 144 includes the REX field 205, the REX′ field 210, the MODR/M.reg field 244, the MODR/M.r/m field 246, the VVVV field 220, xxx field 254, and the bbb field 256.

Augmentation Operation Field

FIG. 2D is a block diagram illustrating the fields of the specific vector friendly instruction format 200 that make up the augmentation operation field 150 according to one embodiment of the invention. When the class (U) field 168 contains 0, it signifies EVEX.U0 (class A 168A); when it contains 1, it signifies EVEX.U1 (class B 168B). When U=0 and the MOD field 242 contains 11 (signifying a no memory access operation), the alpha field 152 (EVEX byte 3, bit [7]-EH) is interpreted as the rs field 152A. When the rs field 152A contains a 1 (round 152A.1), the beta field 154 (EVEX byte 3, bits [6:4]-SSS) is interpreted as the round control field 154A. The round control field 154A includes a one bit SAE field 156 and a two bit round operation field 158. When the rs field 152A contains a 0 (data transform 152A.2), the beta field 154 (EVEX byte 3, bits [6:4]-SSS) is interpreted as a three bit data transform field 154B. When U=0 and the MOD field 242 contains 00, 01, or 10 (signifying a memory access operation), the alpha field 152 (EVEX byte 3, bit [7]-EH) is interpreted as the eviction hint (EH) field 152B and the beta field 154 (EVEX byte 3, bits [6:4]-SSS) is interpreted as a three bit data manipulation field 154C.

When U=1, the alpha field 152 (EVEX byte 3, bit [7]-EH) is interpreted as the write mask control (Z) field 152C. When U=1 and the MOD field 242 contains 11 (signifying a no memory access operation), part of the beta field 154 (EVEX byte 3, bit [4]-S₀) is interpreted as the RL field 157A; when it contains a 1 (round 157A.1) the rest of the beta field 154 (EVEX byte 3, bit [6-5]-S₂₋₁) is interpreted as the round operation field 159A, while when the RL field 157A contains a 0 (VSIZE 157.A2) the rest of the beta field 154 (EVEX byte 3, bit [6-5]-S₂₋₁) is interpreted as the vector length field 159B (EVEX byte 3, bit [6-5]-L₁₋₀). When U=1 and the MOD field 242 contains 00, 01, or 10 (signifying a memory access operation), the beta field 154 (EVEX byte 3, bits [6:4]-SSS) is interpreted as the vector length field 159B (EVEX byte 3, bit [6-5]-L₁₋₀) and the broadcast field 157B (EVEX byte 3, bit [4]-B).

C. Exemplary Register Architecture

FIG. 3 is a block diagram of a register architecture 300 according to one embodiment of the invention. In the embodiment illustrated, there are 32 vector registers 310 that are 512 bits wide; these registers are referenced as zmm0 through zmm31. The lower order 256 bits of the lower 16 zmm registers are overlaid on registers ymm0-16. The lower order 128 bits of the lower 16 zmm registers (the lower order 128 bits of the ymm registers) are overlaid on registers xmm0-15. The specific vector friendly instruction format 200 operates on these overlaid register file as illustrated in the below tables.

Adjustable Vector Length Class Operations Registers Instruction A 110, 115, zmm registers (the vector Templates that do (FIG. 125, 130 length is 64 byte) not include the 1A; U = 0) vector length field B 112 zmm registers (the vector 159B (FIG. length is 64 byte) 1B; U = 1) Instruction templates B 117, 127 zmm, ymm, or xmm registers that do include the (FIG. (the vector length is 64 byte, vector length field 1B; U = 1) 32 byte, or 16 byte) 159B depending on the vector length field 159B

In other words, the vector length field 159B selects between a maximum length and one or more other shorter lengths, where each such shorter length is half the length of the preceding length; and instructions templates without the vector length field 159B operate on the maximum vector length. Further, in one embodiment, the class B instruction templates of the specific vector friendly instruction format 200 operate on packed or scalar single/double-precision floating point data and packed or scalar integer data. Scalar operations are operations performed on the lowest order data element position in an zmm/ymm/xmm register; the higher order data element positions are either left the same as they were prior to the instruction or zeroed depending on the embodiment.

Write mask registers 315—in the embodiment illustrated, there are 8 write mask registers (k0 through k7), each 64 bits in size. In an alternate embodiment, the write mask registers 315 are 16 bits in size. As previously described, in one embodiment of the invention, the vector mask register k0 cannot be used as a write mask; when the encoding that would normally indicate k0 is used for a write mask, it selects a hardwired write mask of 0xFFFF, effectively disabling write masking for that instruction.

General-purpose registers 325—in the embodiment illustrated, there are sixteen 64-bit general-purpose registers that are used along with the existing x86 addressing modes to address memory operands. These registers are referenced by the names RAX, RBX, RCX, RDX, RBP, RSI, RDI, RSP, and R8 through R15.

Scalar floating point stack register file (x87 stack) 345, on which is aliased the MMX packed integer flat register file 350—in the embodiment illustrated, the x87 stack is an eight-element stack used to perform scalar floating-point operations on 32/64/80-bit floating point data using the x87 instruction set extension; while the MMX registers are used to perform operations on 64-bit packed integer data, as well as to hold operands for some operations performed between the MMX and XMM registers.

Alternative embodiments of the invention may use wider or narrower registers. Additionally, alternative embodiments of the invention may use more, less, or different register files and registers.

D. Exemplary Core Architectures, Processors, and Computer Architectures

Processor cores may be implemented in different ways, for different purposes, and in different processors. For instance, implementations of such cores may include: 1) a general purpose in-order core intended for general-purpose computing; 2) a high performance general purpose out-of-order core intended for general-purpose computing; 3) a special purpose core intended primarily for graphics and/or scientific (throughput) computing. Implementations of different processors may include: 1) a CPU including one or more general purpose in-order cores intended for general-purpose computing and/or one or more general purpose out-of-order cores intended for general-purpose computing; and 2) a coprocessor including one or more special purpose cores intended primarily for graphics and/or scientific (throughput). Such different processors lead to different computer system architectures, which may include: 1) the coprocessor on a separate chip from the CPU; 2) the coprocessor on a separate die in the same package as a CPU; 3) the coprocessor on the same die as a CPU (in which case, such a coprocessor is sometimes referred to as special purpose logic, such as integrated graphics and/or scientific (throughput) logic, or as special purpose cores); and 4) a system on a chip that may include on the same die the described CPU (sometimes referred to as the application core(s) or application processor(s)), the above described coprocessor, and additional functionality. Exemplary core architectures are described next, followed by descriptions of exemplary processors and computer architectures.

FIG. 4A is a block diagram illustrating both an exemplary in-order pipeline and an exemplary register renaming, out-of-order issue/execution pipeline according to embodiments of the invention. FIG. 4B is a block diagram illustrating both an exemplary embodiment of an in-order architecture core and an exemplary register renaming, out-of-order issue/execution architecture core to be included in a processor according to embodiments of the invention. The solid lined boxes in FIGS. 4A-B illustrate the in-order pipeline and in-order core, while the optional addition of the dashed lined boxes illustrates the register renaming, out-of-order issue/execution pipeline and core. Given that the in-order aspect is a subset of the out-of-order aspect, the out-of-order aspect will be described.

In FIG. 4A, a processor pipeline 400 includes a fetch stage 402, a length decode stage 404, a decode stage 406, an allocation stage 408, a renaming stage 410, a scheduling (also known as a dispatch or issue) stage 412, a register read/memory read stage 414, an execute stage 416, a write back/memory write stage 418, an exception handling stage 422, and a commit stage 424.

FIG. 4B shows processor core 490 including a front end unit 430 coupled to an execution engine unit 450, and both are coupled to a memory unit 470. The core 490 may be a reduced instruction set computing (RISC) core, a complex instruction set computing (CISC) core, a very long instruction word (VLIW) core, or a hybrid or alternative core type. As yet another option, the core 490 may be a special-purpose core, such as, for example, a network or communication core, compression engine, coprocessor core, general purpose computing graphics processing unit (GPGPU) core, graphics core, or the like.

The front end unit 430 includes a branch prediction unit 432 coupled to an instruction cache unit 434, which is coupled to an instruction translation lookaside buffer (TLB) 436, which is coupled to an instruction fetch unit 438, which is coupled to a decode unit 440. The decode unit 440 (or decoder) may decode instructions, and generate as an output one or more micro-operations, micro-code entry points, microinstructions, other instructions, or other control signals, which are decoded from, or which otherwise reflect, or are derived from, the original instructions. The decode unit 440 may be implemented using various different mechanisms. Examples of suitable mechanisms include, but are not limited to, look-up tables, hardware implementations, programmable logic arrays (PLAs), microcode read only memories (ROMs), etc. In one embodiment, the core 490 includes a microcode ROM or other medium that stores microcode for certain macroinstructions (e.g., in decode unit 440 or otherwise within the front end unit 430). The decode unit 440 is coupled to a rename/allocator unit 452 in the execution engine unit 450.

The execution engine unit 450 includes the rename/allocator unit 452 coupled to a retirement unit 454 and a set of one or more scheduler unit(s) 456. The scheduler unit(s) 456 represents any number of different schedulers, including reservations stations, central instruction window, etc. The scheduler unit(s) 456 is coupled to the physical register file(s) unit(s) 458. Each of the physical register file(s) units 458 represents one or more physical register files, different ones of which store one or more different data types, such as scalar integer, scalar floating point, packed integer, packed floating point, vector integer, vector floating point, status (e.g., an instruction pointer that is the address of the next instruction to be executed), etc. In one embodiment, the physical register file(s) unit 458 comprises a vector registers unit, a write mask registers unit, and a scalar registers unit. These register units may provide architectural vector registers, vector mask registers, and general purpose registers. The physical register file(s) unit(s) 458 is overlapped by the retirement unit 454 to illustrate various ways in which register renaming and out-of-order execution may be implemented (e.g., using a reorder buffer(s) and a retirement register file(s); using a future file(s), a history buffer(s), and a retirement register file(s); using a register maps and a pool of registers; etc.). The retirement unit 454 and the physical register file(s) unit(s) 458 are coupled to the execution cluster(s) 460. The execution cluster(s) 460 includes a set of one or more execution units 462 and a set of one or more memory access units 464. The execution units 462 may perform various operations (e.g., shifts, addition, subtraction, multiplication) and on various types of data (e.g., scalar floating point, packed integer, packed floating point, vector integer, vector floating point). While some embodiments may include a number of execution units dedicated to specific functions or sets of functions, other embodiments may include only one execution unit or multiple execution units that all perform all functions. The scheduler unit(s) 456, physical register file(s) unit(s) 458, and execution cluster(s) 460 are shown as being possibly plural because certain embodiments create separate pipelines for certain types of data/operations (e.g., a scalar integer pipeline, a scalar floating point/packed integer/packed floating point/vector integer/vector floating point pipeline, and/or a memory access pipeline that each have their own scheduler unit, physical register file(s) unit, and/or execution cluster—and in the case of a separate memory access pipeline, certain embodiments are implemented in which only the execution cluster of this pipeline has the memory access unit(s) 464). It should also be understood that where separate pipelines are used, one or more of these pipelines may be out-of-order issue/execution and the rest in-order.

The set of memory access units 464 is coupled to the memory unit 470, which includes a data TLB unit 472 coupled to a data cache unit 474 coupled to a level 2 (L2) cache unit 476. In one exemplary embodiment, the memory access units 464 may include a load unit, a store address unit, and a store data unit, each of which is coupled to the data TLB unit 472 in the memory unit 470. The instruction cache unit 434 is further coupled to a level 2 (L2) cache unit 476 in the memory unit 470. The L2 cache unit 476 is coupled to one or more other levels of cache and eventually to a main memory.

By way of example, the exemplary register renaming, out-of-order issue/execution core architecture may implement the pipeline 400 as follows: 1) the instruction fetch 438 performs the fetch and length decoding stages 402 and 404; 2) the decode unit 440 performs the decode stage 406; 3) the rename/allocator unit 452 performs the allocation stage 408 and renaming stage 410; 4) the scheduler unit(s) 456 performs the schedule stage 412; 5) the physical register file(s) unit(s) 458 and the memory unit 470 perform the register read/memory read stage 414; the execution cluster 460 perform the execute stage 416; 6) the memory unit 470 and the physical register file(s) unit(s) 458 perform the write back/memory write stage 418; 7) various units may be involved in the exception handling stage 422; and 8) the retirement unit 454 and the physical register file(s) unit(s) 458 perform the commit stage 424.

The core 490 may support one or more instructions sets (e.g., the x86 instruction set (with some extensions that have been added with newer versions); the MIPS instruction set of MIPS Technologies of Sunnyvale, Calif.; the ARM instruction set (with optional additional extensions such as NEON) of ARM Holdings of Sunnyvale, Calif.), including the instruction(s) described herein. In one embodiment, the core 490 includes logic to support a packed data instruction set extension (e.g., AVX1, AVX2), thereby allowing the operations used by many multimedia applications to be performed using packed data.

It should be understood that the core may support multithreading (executing two or more parallel sets of operations or threads), and may do so in a variety of ways including time sliced multithreading, simultaneous multithreading (where a single physical core provides a logical core for each of the threads that physical core is simultaneously multithreading), or a combination thereof (e.g., time sliced fetching and decoding and simultaneous multithreading thereafter such as in the Intel® Hyperthreading technology).

While register renaming is described in the context of out-of-order execution, it should be understood that register renaming may be used in an in-order architecture. While the illustrated embodiment of the processor also includes separate instruction and data cache units 434/474 and a shared L2 cache unit 476, alternative embodiments may have a single internal cache for both instructions and data, such as, for example, a Level 1 (L1) internal cache, or multiple levels of internal cache. In some embodiments, the system may include a combination of an internal cache and an external cache that is external to the core and/or the processor. Alternatively, all of the cache may be external to the core and/or the processor.

FIGS. 5A-B illustrate a block diagram of a more specific exemplary in-order core architecture, which core would be one of several logic blocks (including other cores of the same type and/or different types) in a chip. The logic blocks communicate through a high-bandwidth interconnect network (e.g., a ring network) with some fixed function logic, memory I/O interfaces, and other necessary I/O logic, depending on the application.

FIG. 5A is a block diagram of a single processor core, along with its connection to the on-die interconnect network 502 and with its local subset of the Level 2 (L2) cache 504, according to embodiments of the invention. In one embodiment, an instruction decoder 500 supports the x86 instruction set with a packed data instruction set extension. An L1 cache 506 allows low-latency accesses to cache memory into the scalar and vector units. While in one embodiment (to simplify the design), a scalar unit 508 and a vector unit 510 use separate register sets (respectively, scalar registers 512 and vector registers 514) and data transferred between them is written to memory and then read back in from a level 1 (L1) cache 506, alternative embodiments of the invention may use a different approach (e.g., use a single register set or include a communication path that allow data to be transferred between the two register files without being written and read back).

The local subset of the L2 cache 504 is part of a global L2 cache that is divided into separate local subsets, one per processor core. Each processor core has a direct access path to its own local subset of the L2 cache 504. Data read by a processor core is stored in its L2 cache subset 504 and can be accessed quickly, in parallel with other processor cores accessing their own local L2 cache subsets. Data written by a processor core is stored in its own L2 cache subset 504 and is flushed from other subsets, if necessary. The ring network ensures coherency for shared data. The ring network is bi-directional to allow agents such as processor cores, L2 caches and other logic blocks to communicate with each other within the chip. Each ring data-path is 1012-bits wide per direction.

FIG. 5B is an expanded view of part of the processor core in FIG. 5A according to embodiments of the invention. FIG. 5B includes an L1 data cache 506A part of the L1 cache 504, as well as more detail regarding the vector unit 510 and the vector registers 514. Specifically, the vector unit 510 is a 16-wide vector processing unit (VPU) (see the 16-wide ALU 528), which executes one or more of integer, single-precision float, and double-precision float instructions. The VPU supports swizzling the register inputs with swizzle unit 520, numeric conversion with numeric convert units 522A-B, and replication with replication unit 524 on the memory input. Write mask registers 526 allow predicating resulting vector writes.

FIG. 6 is a block diagram of a processor 600 that may have more than one core, may have an integrated memory controller, and may have integrated graphics according to embodiments of the invention. The solid lined boxes in FIG. 6 illustrate a processor 600 with a single core 602A, a system agent 610, a set of one or more bus controller units 616, while the optional addition of the dashed lined boxes illustrates an alternative processor 600 with multiple cores 602A-N, a set of one or more integrated memory controller unit(s) 614 in the system agent unit 610, and special purpose logic 608.

Thus, different implementations of the processor 600 may include: 1) a CPU with the special purpose logic 608 being integrated graphics and/or scientific (throughput) logic (which may include one or more cores), and the cores 602A-N being one or more general purpose cores (e.g., general purpose in-order cores, general purpose out-of-order cores, a combination of the two); 2) a coprocessor with the cores 602A-N being a large number of special purpose cores intended primarily for graphics and/or scientific (throughput); and 3) a coprocessor with the cores 602A-N being a large number of general purpose in-order cores. Thus, the processor 600 may be a general-purpose processor, coprocessor or special-purpose processor, such as, for example, a network or communication processor, compression engine, graphics processor, GPGPU (general purpose graphics processing unit), a high-throughput many integrated core (MIC) coprocessor (including 30 or more cores), embedded processor, or the like. The processor may be implemented on one or more chips. The processor 600 may be a part of and/or may be implemented on one or more substrates using any of a number of process technologies, such as, for example, BiCMOS, CMOS, or NMOS.

The memory hierarchy includes one or more levels of cache within the cores, a set or one or more shared cache units 606, and external memory (not shown) coupled to the set of integrated memory controller units 614. The set of shared cache units 606 may include one or more mid-level caches, such as level 2 (L2), level 3 (L3), level 4 (L4), or other levels of cache, a last level cache (LLC), and/or combinations thereof. While in one embodiment a ring based interconnect unit 612 interconnects the integrated graphics logic 608, the set of shared cache units 606, and the system agent unit 610/integrated memory controller unit(s) 614, alternative embodiments may use any number of well-known techniques for interconnecting such units. In one embodiment, coherency is maintained between one or more cache units 606 and cores 602-A-N.

In some embodiments, one or more of the cores 602A-N are capable of multi-threading. The system agent 610 includes those components coordinating and operating cores 602A-N. The system agent unit 610 may include for example a power control unit (PCU) and a display unit. The PCU may be or include logic and components needed for regulating the power state of the cores 602A-N and the integrated graphics logic 608. The display unit is for driving one or more externally connected displays.

The cores 602A-N may be homogenous or heterogeneous in terms of architecture instruction set; that is, two or more of the cores 602A-N may be capable of execution the same instruction set, while others may be capable of executing only a subset of that instruction set or a different instruction set.

FIGS. 7-10 are block diagrams of exemplary computer architectures. Other system designs and configurations known in the arts for laptops, desktops, handheld PCs, personal digital assistants, engineering workstations, servers, network devices, network hubs, switches, embedded processors, digital signal processors (DSPs), graphics devices, video game devices, set-top boxes, micro controllers, cell phones, portable media players, hand held devices, and various other electronic devices, are also suitable. In general, a huge variety of systems or electronic devices capable of incorporating a processor and/or other execution logic as disclosed herein are generally suitable.

Referring now to FIG. 7, shown is a block diagram of a system 700 in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. The system 700 may include one or more processors 710, 715, which are coupled to a controller hub 720. In one embodiment the controller hub 720 includes a graphics memory controller hub (GMCH) 790 and an Input/Output Hub (IOH) 750 (which may be on separate chips); the GMCH 790 includes memory and graphics controllers to which are coupled memory 740 and a coprocessor 745; the IOH 750 is couples input/output (I/O) devices 760 to the GMCH 790. Alternatively, one or both of the memory and graphics controllers are integrated within the processor (as described herein), the memory 740 and the coprocessor 745 are coupled directly to the processor 710, and the controller hub 720 in a single chip with the IOH 750.

The optional nature of additional processors 715 is denoted in FIG. 7 with broken lines. Each processor 710, 715 may include one or more of the processing cores described herein and may be some version of the processor 600.

The memory 740 may be, for example, dynamic random access memory (DRAM), phase change memory (PCM), or a combination of the two. For at least one embodiment, the controller hub 720 communicates with the processor(s) 710, 715 via a multi-drop bus, such as a frontside bus (FSB), point-to-point interface such as QuickPath Interconnect (QPI), or similar connection 795.

In one embodiment, the coprocessor 745 is a special-purpose processor, such as, for example, a high-throughput MIC processor, a network or communication processor, compression engine, graphics processor, GPGPU, embedded processor, or the like. In one embodiment, controller hub 720 may include an integrated graphics accelerator.

There can be a variety of differences between the physical resources 710, 715 in terms of a spectrum of metrics of merit including architectural, microarchitectural, thermal, power consumption characteristics, and the like.

In one embodiment, the processor 710 executes instructions that control data processing operations of a general type. Embedded within the instructions may be coprocessor instructions. The processor 710 recognizes these coprocessor instructions as being of a type that should be executed by the attached coprocessor 745. Accordingly, the processor 710 issues these coprocessor instructions (or control signals representing coprocessor instructions) on a coprocessor bus or other interconnect, to coprocessor 745. Coprocessor(s) 745 accept and execute the received coprocessor instructions.

Referring now to FIG. 8, shown is a block diagram of a first more specific exemplary system 800 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. As shown in FIG. 8, multiprocessor system 800 is a point-to-point interconnect system, and includes a first processor 870 and a second processor 880 coupled via a point-to-point interconnect 850. Each of processors 870 and 880 may be some version of the processor 600. In one embodiment of the invention, processors 870 and 880 are respectively processors 710 and 715, while coprocessor 838 is coprocessor 745. In another embodiment, processors 870 and 880 are respectively processor 710 coprocessor 745.

Processors 870 and 880 are shown including integrated memory controller (IMC) units 872 and 882, respectively. Processor 870 also includes as part of its bus controller units point-to-point (P-P) interfaces 876 and 878; similarly, second processor 880 includes P-P interfaces 886 and 888. Processors 870, 880 may exchange information via a point-to-point (P-P) interface 850 using P-P interface circuits 878, 888. As shown in FIG. 8, IMCs 872 and 882 couple the processors to respective memories, namely a memory 832 and a memory 834, which may be portions of main memory locally attached to the respective processors.

Processors 870, 880 may each exchange information with a chipset 890 via individual P-P interfaces 852, 854 using point to point interface circuits 876, 894, 886, 898. Chipset 890 may optionally exchange information with the coprocessor 838 via a high-performance interface 839. In one embodiment, the coprocessor 838 is a special-purpose processor, such as, for example, a high-throughput MIC processor, a network or communication processor, compression engine, graphics processor, GPGPU, embedded processor, or the like.

A shared cache (not shown) may be included in either processor or outside of both processors, yet connected with the processors via P-P interconnect, such that either or both processors' local cache information may be stored in the shared cache if a processor is placed into a low power mode.

Chipset 890 may be coupled to a first bus 816 via an interface 896. In one embodiment, first bus 816 may be a Peripheral Component Interconnect (PCI) bus, or a bus such as a PCI Express bus or another third generation I/O interconnect bus, although the scope of the present invention is not so limited.

As shown in FIG. 8, various I/O devices 814 may be coupled to first bus 816, along with a bus bridge 818 which couples first bus 816 to a second bus 820. In one embodiment, one or more additional processor(s) 815, such as coprocessors, high-throughput MIC processors, GPGPU's, accelerators (such as, e.g., graphics accelerators or digital signal processing (DSP) units), field programmable gate arrays, or any other processor, are coupled to first bus 816. In one embodiment, second bus 820 may be a low pin count (LPC) bus. Various devices may be coupled to a second bus 820 including, for example, a keyboard and/or mouse 822, communication devices 827 and a storage unit 828 such as a disk drive or other mass storage device which may include instructions/code and data 830, in one embodiment. Further, an audio I/O 824 may be coupled to the second bus 820. Note that other architectures are possible. For example, instead of the point-to-point architecture of FIG. 8, a system may implement a multi-drop bus or other such architecture.

Referring now to FIG. 9, shown is a block diagram of a second more specific exemplary system 900 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. Like elements in FIGS. 8 and 9 bear like reference numerals, and certain aspects of FIG. 8 have been omitted from FIG. 9 in order to avoid obscuring other aspects of FIG. 9.

FIG. 9 illustrates that the processors 870, 880 may include integrated memory and I/O control logic (“CL”) 872 and 882, respectively. Thus, the CL 872, 882 include integrated memory controller units and include I/O control logic. FIG. 9 illustrates that not only are the memories 832, 834 coupled to the CL 872, 882, but also that I/O devices 914 are also coupled to the control logic 872, 882. Legacy I/O devices 915 are coupled to the chipset 890.

Referring now to FIG. 10, shown is a block diagram of a SoC 1000 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. Similar elements in FIG. 6 bear like reference numerals. Also, dashed lined boxes are optional features on more advanced SoCs. In FIG. 10, an interconnect unit(s) 1002 is coupled to: an application processor 1010 which includes a set of one or more cores 202A-N and shared cache unit(s) 606; a system agent unit 610; a bus controller unit(s) 616; an integrated memory controller unit(s) 614; a set or one or more coprocessors 1020 which may include integrated graphics logic, an image processor, an audio processor, and a video processor; an static random access memory (SRAM) unit 1030; a direct memory access (DMA) unit 1032; and a display unit 1040 for coupling to one or more external displays. In one embodiment, the coprocessor(s) 1020 include a special-purpose processor, such as, for example, a network or communication processor, compression engine, GPGPU, a high-throughput MIC processor, embedded processor, or the like.

Embodiments of the mechanisms disclosed herein may be implemented in hardware, software, firmware, or a combination of such implementation approaches. Embodiments of the invention may be implemented as computer programs or program code executing on programmable systems comprising at least one processor, a storage system (including volatile and non-volatile memory and/or storage elements), at least one input device, and at least one output device.

Program code, such as code 830 illustrated in FIG. 8, may be applied to input instructions to perform the functions described herein and generate output information. The output information may be applied to one or more output devices, in known fashion. For purposes of this application, a processing system includes any system that has a processor, such as, for example; a digital signal processor (DSP), a microcontroller, an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC), or a microprocessor.

The program code may be implemented in a high level procedural or object oriented programming language to communicate with a processing system. The program code may also be implemented in assembly or machine language, if desired. In fact, the mechanisms described herein are not limited in scope to any particular programming language. In any case, the language may be a compiled or interpreted language.

One or more aspects of at least one embodiment may be implemented by representative instructions stored on a machine-readable medium which represents various logic within the processor, which when read by a machine causes the machine to fabricate logic to perform the techniques described herein. Such representations, known as “IP cores” may be stored on a tangible, machine readable medium and supplied to various customers or manufacturing facilities to load into the fabrication machines that actually make the logic or processor.

Such machine-readable storage media may include, without limitation, non-transitory, tangible arrangements of articles manufactured or formed by a machine or device, including storage media such as hard disks, any other type of disk including floppy disks, optical disks, compact disk read-only memories (CD-ROMs), compact disk rewritable's (CD-RWs), and magneto-optical disks, semiconductor devices such as read-only memories (ROMs), random access memories (RAMs) such as dynamic random access memories (DRAMs), static random access memories (SRAMs), erasable programmable read-only memories (EPROMs), flash memories, electrically erasable programmable read-only memories (EEPROMs), phase change memory (PCM), magnetic or optical cards, or any other type of media suitable for storing electronic instructions.

Accordingly, embodiments of the invention also include non-transitory, tangible machine-readable media containing instructions or containing design data, such as Hardware Description Language (HDL), which defines structures, circuits, apparatuses, processors and/or system features described herein. Such embodiments may also be referred to as program products.

In some cases, an instruction converter may be used to convert an instruction from a source instruction set to a target instruction set. For example, the instruction converter may translate (e.g., using static binary translation, dynamic binary translation including dynamic compilation), morph, emulate, or otherwise convert an instruction to one or more other instructions to be processed by the core. The instruction converter may be implemented in software, hardware, firmware, or a combination thereof. The instruction converter may be on processor, off processor, or part on and part off processor.

FIG. 11 is a block diagram contrasting the use of a software instruction converter to convert binary instructions in a source instruction set to binary instructions in a target instruction set according to embodiments of the invention. In the illustrated embodiment, the instruction converter is a software instruction converter, although alternatively the instruction converter may be implemented in software, firmware, hardware, or various combinations thereof. FIG. 11 shows a program in a high level language 1102 may be compiled using an x86 compiler 1104 to generate x86 binary code 1106 that may be natively executed by a processor with at least one x86 instruction set core 1116. The processor with at least one x86 instruction set core 1116 represents any processor that can perform substantially the same functions as an Intel processor with at least one x86 instruction set core by compatibly executing or otherwise processing (1) a substantial portion of the instruction set of the Intel x86 instruction set core or (2) object code versions of applications or other software targeted to run on an Intel processor with at least one x86 instruction set core, in order to achieve substantially the same result as an Intel processor with at least one x86 instruction set core. The x86 compiler 1104 represents a compiler that is operable to generate x86 binary code 1106 (e.g., object code) that can, with or without additional linkage processing, be executed on the processor with at least one x86 instruction set core 1116. Similarly, FIG. 11 shows the program in the high level language 1102 may be compiled using an alternative instruction set compiler 1108 to generate alternative instruction set binary code 1110 that may be natively executed by a processor without at least one x86 instruction set core 1114 (e.g., a processor with cores that execute the MIPS instruction set of MIPS Technologies of Sunnyvale, Calif. and/or that execute the ARM instruction set of ARM Holdings of Sunnyvale, Calif.). The instruction converter 1112 is used to convert the x86 binary code 1106 into code that may be natively executed by the processor without an x86 instruction set core 1114. This converted code is not likely to be the same as the alternative instruction set binary code 1110 because an instruction converter capable of this is difficult to make; however, the converted code will accomplish the general operation and be made up of instructions from the alternative instruction set. Thus, the instruction converter 1112 represents software, firmware, hardware, or a combination thereof that, through emulation, simulation or any other process, allows a processor or other electronic device that does not have an x86 instruction set processor or core to execute the x86 binary code 1106.

Apparatus and Method for Efficient Call/Return Emulation Using a Dual Return Stack Buffer

Two types of branch instructions that are common to most computer processors are the “Call Subroutine” and the “Return From Subroutine” branch instructions (referred to generally as Call and Return instructions, respectively). A Call instruction directs the microprocessor to push a return address onto the top of a Last-In-First-Out (LIFO) stack and then proceeds with execution at a designated subroutine target address. The complimentary Return instruction instructs the microprocessor to pop a return address off of the LIFO stack and begin executing instructions at that address.

In most microprocessors, the LIFO stack is stored in a main memory coupled to the microprocessor and is often maintained using a microprocessor register as a stack pointer. Thus, the Return instruction is an unconditional branch instruction that requires an access to main memory to execute. In the current generation of high-speed microprocessors, instructions that access main memory are slow relative to other instructions. It is therefore desirable to be able to predict the return address of Return instructions such that the processor does not need to stall while the main memory access occurs. This is usually accomplished using a return stack buffer (RSB).

An RSB is a small buffer implemented within a microprocessor core that contains a LIFO stack of return addresses. Each time a Call instruction is encountered, a return address is “pushed” onto the return stack buffer. When a later Return instruction is encountered, the return address on the top of the RSB is “popped” off and given to the instruction fetch unit. This technique can very accurately predict the behavior of Call and Return instructions.

The techniques described below enable fast and efficient emulation of Call and Return sequences for a binary translation system such as an x86 binary translation system running on an out-of-order superscalar core. This is an important optimization as it enables for efficient implementations of these instructions by binary translation systems and just-in-time compilers (JITs) if exposed to them. Emulation of x86 Call and Returns is difficult to implement for binary translation based systems, as they may cross an x86 page boundary and the binary translator has to check that the emulated stack was not modified. Given the frequency of call and returns, the binary translator has to be very efficient in emulating them and performing all necessary checks. The embodiments of the invention address these issues by adding hardware support to remove some of the instructions that a binary translator would have to emit in order to perform the necessary consistency checks and redirect the front-end accordingly.

As used herein, the guest instruction set architecture (ISA) refers to the program code which is executed through a binary translator (i.e., and is emulated by a binary translator) while the host ISA, or native ISA (nISA) refers to the code generated by the binary translator for direct execution by the underlying hardware. Various different implementations of the guest ISA and native ISA are contemplated within the scope of the present disclosure. For example, in one embodiment, the guest ISA comprises standard x86 code and the native ISA comprises optimized program code (e.g., including both optimized code and x86 code). In another embodiment, the guest ISA comprises standard x86 code and the native ISA comprises a completely different ISA. In yet another embodiment, the native ISA comprises x86 and the guest ISA comprises non-x86 program code.

One embodiment of the invention augments the existing RSB mechanism with the support required in order to track both the guest ISA and native ISA return addresses. FIG. 12 illustrates an exemplary processor 1255 on which embodiments of the invention may be implemented which includes a dual RSB 1205 which tracks return addresses for the guest ISA and corresponding return addresses for the host ISA, as described in detail below.

The exemplary embodiment includes a plurality of cores 0-N, each including a memory management unit 1290 for performing memory operations (e.g., such as load/store operations), a set of general purpose registers (GPRs) 1205, a set of vector registers 1206, and a set of mask registers 1207. In one embodiment, multiple vector data elements are packed into each vector register 1206 which may have a 512 bit width for storing two 256 bit values, four 128 bit values, eight 64 bit values, sixteen 32 bit values, etc. However, the underlying principles of the invention are not limited to any particular size/type of vector data. In one embodiment, the mask registers 1207 include eight 64-bit operand mask registers used for performing bit masking operations on the values stored in the vector registers 1206 (e.g., implemented as mask registers k0-k7 described above). However, the underlying principles of the invention are not limited to any particular mask register size/type.

The details of a single processor core (“Core 0”) are illustrated in FIG. 12 for simplicity. It will be understood, however, that each core of the processor 1255 may have the same set of logic as Core 0. For example, each core may include a dedicated Level 1 (L1) cache 1212 and Level 2 (L2) cache 1211 for caching instructions and data according to a specified cache management policy. The L1 cache 1212 includes a separate instruction cache 1220 for storing instructions and a separate data cache 1221 for storing data. The instructions and data stored within the various processor caches are managed at the granularity of cache lines which may be a fixed size (e.g., 64, 128, 512 Bytes in length). Each core of this exemplary embodiment has an instruction fetch unit 1210 for fetching instructions from main memory 1200 and/or a shared Level 3 (L3) cache 1216; a decode unit 1220 for decoding the instructions (e.g., decoding program instructions into micro-operatons or “uops”); an execution unit 1240 for executing the instructions; and a writeback unit 1250 for retiring the instructions and writing back the results.

The instruction fetch unit 1210 includes various well known components including a next instruction pointer 1203 for storing the address of the next instruction to be fetched from memory 1200 (or one of the caches); an instruction translation look-aside buffer (ITLB) 1204 for storing a map of recently used virtual-to-physical instruction addresses to improve the speed of address translation; a branch prediction unit 1202 for speculatively predicting instruction branch addresses; and branch target buffers (BTBs) 1201 for storing branch addresses and target addresses. Once fetched, instructions are then streamed to the remaining stages of the instruction pipeline including the decode unit 1230, the execution unit 1240, and the writeback unit 1250. The structure and function of each of these units is well understood by those of ordinary skill in the art and will not be described here in detail to avoid obscuring the pertinent aspects of the different embodiments of the invention.

FIG. 13A illustrates an exemplary binary translation architecture on which the embodiments of the invention may be implemented. As mentioned above, a binary translator 1300 translates between a guest ISA 1315 and a native ISA 1310 executed directly by the underlying processor hardware 1255. FIG. 13 also illustrates additional details of the dual RSB 1205 for maintaining return addresses for both the guest ISA and the native ISA. In particular, the illustrated dual RSB 1205 includes an RSB component 1301 for storing return addresses 1303 for native ISA program code and an extended RSB (XRSB) component 1302 for storing emulated return addresses 1303 for guest program code. In one embodiment, when binary translation is not utilized (e.g., when in x86 mode) only the base RSB 1301 is used. For the remainder of this detailed description, it will be assumed that binary translation and, thus, the extended RSB is being used.

In operation, the XRSB 1302 is used to hold an x86 return address, and the RSB 1301 holds either an x86 or a translated return address, depending on a current mode of operation. As discussed below, this dual RSB implementation dramatically simplifies the sequence of operations required to process return addresses in a binary translation system. In one embodiment, a new return instruction is used to access the XRSB 1302 to determine the return address following execution of the called/translated instruction sequence. In addition, in one embodiment, logic is provided to ensure that the return address matches the expected value for the return address. In particular, as described in greater detail below, comparison logic 1350 compares the return address and associated information stored in the XRSB 1302 with values read from the branch processing unit 1303. If the return address value in the XRSB matches the expected value, then it is used, resulting in a significant performance improvement. In the rare event that it does not match, then in one embodiment, an interrupt or trap is generated and handed off to the binary translator 1300 which takes control and recovers as described below.

In one embodiment, in addition to the XRSB 1302 which stores return addresses of emulated code, the dual RSB 1205 includes a mode bit in the RSB 1301 and additional logic described herein to interface with the emulated instruction pointer address (EMU_RIP) 1303. In one embodiment, the XRSB 1302 has one read/write port and 16 entries, although the underlying principles of the invention are not limited to this particular configuration.

FIG. 13B illustrates additional detail in accordance with one embodiment of the invention. In particular, this embodiment illustrates a 1:16 port mux 1360 coupled to the RSB 1301 and used to store next linear instruction pointer (NLIP) values in response to a top of stack (TOS) signal (indicating the current top of the instruction stack) and another 1:16 port mux 1361 coupled to the XRSB 1302 and used to write emulated next return instruction pointer (EMU_NRIP) values in response to a MKNRIP (make next RIP) instruction. Values are read from the XRSB 1302 and applied as input to a 2:1 mux 1362 along with a decoded/predicted EMU_RIP value. The output of the mux 1362 is used as the EMU_RIP in response to a MKRIP (make RIP) instruction. It should be noted that EMU_NRIP is different from EMU_RIP in that it is a “future” value of EMU_RIP. For example, a value placed in EMU_NRIP will be pushed to the RSB 1301, and upon a successful return, will become EMU_RIP in the future.

In one embodiment, the dual RSB 1205 links the guest ISA (e.g., x86) return target with native ISA (nISA) return target. As illustrated in the exemplary program code sequence 1370 in FIG. 13B, the nISA return targets always contain XCATNE instructions which checks the physical page properties (e.g., to determine if a page boundary is crossed as discussed below). While the XCATNE instructions are employed in some embodiments described herein, the functions performed by the XCATNE instructions are generally applicable to any core- (system-level) BT implementation. These instructions may check several things besides physical page properties, such as assumptions about “entry” CPU context to the return point. In one embodiment, if this x86/nISA link is broken, then XCATNE fails. The mkrip/mknrip/xcalln instructions may be folded into a single 8B macro-operation if values are encodable within the limits of the instruction. As illustrated, a decoded/predicted EMU_RIP may be compared against the return address from the XRSB 1302 and selected in the event of a mis-prediction (i.e., in the event that the value read from the XRSB 1302 is not the expected value).

Before explaining the operation of the dual RSB 1205 in more detail, the exemplary the call and return sequences used by the binary translator 1300 will be outlined.

FIG. 14, for example, shows an exemplary call and return sequence for a piece of x86 code. In x86, foo is assumed to be at address 0x000. A call to the bar function will transfer the lip to the address 0x0100. The RET instruction will then jump back to the instruction after the call instruction, which for simplicity is called foo-cont and is located at address 0x003.

When in binary translation (BT) mode, the ADDRIP instruction is used to create the continuation x86 address (0x003). ADDRIP will read from the branch address calculation (BAC) the current value of the emulated return instruction pointer (EMU_RIP) and update the lower twelve bits. As discussed below, the MKRIP instruction updates all but the lower twelve bits of the EMU_RIP (used for translation consistency). The ADDRIP instruction will update the front-end copy of the EMU_RIP register at the BAC, and will also move this address to r31. It is assumed that the register r4 will maintain the copy of the IA RSP (assuming that the BT has this register pinned for this use). The x86 return address is copied to the emulated stack using a store instruction, and the emulated RSP is updated (store and sub instructions). Then, an nISA call to bar′ is performed which pushes the nISA return address to the RSB 1301 and the EMU_RIP to the XRSB 1302 (and, in one embodiment, a summary of the x86 context as well). At the point where a return is needed from the bar′ function, the x86 return address is loaded from the emulated x86 stack (memory) and the emulated RSP is updated (load and add instructions). The return instruction will read the nISA return address from the RSB 1301, and update the EMU_RIP that we have at the BAC with the x86 return address it gets from the XRSB 1302. The x86 return address is then passed to the JEU as the prediction for the return and a comparator 1350 compares it against the loaded emulated return address. In case of a mismatch, the return will act as a misprediction, but will redirect the front-end to a software Dual RSB handler or an overflow of the Dual-RSB, which can occur when the number of consecutive calls is greater than the size of the Dual RSB (mispredictions are discussed in greater detail below). Note that mispredictions in this context will be very rare, resulting only because the stack was modified, the result of a changed CS_LIMIT, or changes to any of the descriptors. One other, slightly more common case is when the original program has a call-stack depth greater than that of the RSB 1301. This sometimes happens in deeply recursive functions, or in heavily object-oriented code which has deep call-stack depth.

FIG. 15 depicts a scenario in which the x86 foo and bar functions are in different 4 KB pages. When in nISA mode, the call side is exactly the same as in the previous example. However, since an x86 page is crossed, the BT will insert what is referred to herein as an inter-page prologue (IPP) check to make sure that the translation for the bar function is consistent. As such, a MKRIP instruction is inserted that updates the EMU_RIP with the current value while at the bar′ function. The update to the EMU_RIP triggers an access to the iTLB which results in an EMU_PA (emulated physical address). The XCATNE instruction will then check the EMU_PA against what it currently encodes as the assumed physical address for this translation. For additional detail on the XCATNE instruction, exemplary embodiments are described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/672,158, Filed Mar. 28, 2015. In one embodiment, the EMU_PA is an immediate in the XCATNE instruction. If the two addresses match, and the T-Bit is set, and if the x86 context summary matches, then the XCATNE acts as a NOP.

When a return is performed, the process is similar to the previous example, but now before any instruction is executed in foo-cont′, the translation needs to be checked for consistency. Note that in this scenario, a MKRIP instruction is not needed as the RET will update the EMU_RIP with the x86 return address.

The final simple scenario in FIG. 16 shows what happens when the original CALL and RET crosses a 4 GB boundary. The scenario is identical to the page cross scenario except for the fact that the MKRIP instruction will have to deal with a very large immediate. Depending on the nISA encoding space, this may have to be split in an MKRIP_HI and a normal MKRIP instruction. The rest of the sequence remains the same.

FIG. 17 depicts an exemplary state of the dual RSB 1305 as the instructions for the simple same page scenario execute. Note that both the EMU_RIP and the dual RSB 1205 reside in the branch address calculation (BAC), and as such they are updated speculatively. When the ADDRIP instruction passes through the BAC, the EMU_RIP register is updated. Since the ADDRIP is only updating the lower 12 bits, there is no need to check the instruction TLB (iTLB). Also, the ADDRIP does not really perform an addition; it just overwrites the lower 12 bits of the EMU_RIP with the value that it has encoded as an immediate. The nISA call instruction performs multiple operations. It first computes the next sequential nISA lip and pushes that to the TOS along with the current value of the EMU_RIP register. It also updates the nISA lip to be the one it encodes as part of its opcode. In case the call is indirect, the nISA nlip can come from the indirect predictor, but the update of the dual RSB is the same otherwise. At the point where the return instruction passes through the BAC, the EMU_RIP is updated with the x86 return address that is kept at the TOS. The nISA nlip is taken from the RSB TOS. The x86 return address is then compared against the one loaded from memory in the JEU for verification.

FIG. 18 illustrates an exemplary scenario where an x86 page is crossed. The sequence is the same as before, except that now an MKRIP and an XCATNE instruction have to be added. The MKRIP instruction will update all bits but the 12 least significant. The XCATNE instruction will then be checked against the physical address mapped to the updated emulated RIP address. Note that the least significant bits of the EMU_RIP here are potentially meaningless, but this is fine as there is no real use for them at this point. When the return happens, the EMU_RIP is overwritten with the contents of the TOS of the XRSB.

FIG. 19 illustrates the same scenario, but it assumes that something went wrong and the x86 return addresses do not match. This scenario is treated mostly as a misprediction, i.e.: the retirement copy of the EMU_RIP is copied to the copy at the BAC; the front-end is re-directed to the software Dual RSB handler; the instruction queue is blocked when the RET reaches retirement; the retirement copy of the Dual RSB TOS is copied to the BAC; an ROClear is issued and the instruction queue gets unblocked. Recovery is covered later in more detail.

One embodiment of the invention implements a different code sequence scheme which utilizes two different registers: EMU_RIP and EMU_NRIP.

The EMU_RIP or “Emulated RIP”, represents the approximate current x86 RIP at any given time. The upper bits (Virtual Page Number) are correct at a given time. The EMU_NRIP or “Emulated NEXT RIP”, represents the current x86 RIP at any given time. All bits are correct at call emulation sites (i.e., in order to properly update x86 stack and XRSB).

These different code sequences utilize more complex instructions which do more work per individual instructions as shown below:

A) Call Emulation (in-Page)

-   1. mknripi 0, <ret_byte_offset>;     EMU_NRIP=(EMU_RIP+0)|ret_byte_offset. This instruction updates     EMU_NRIP using current page and a supplied offset. -   2. calln 0, <BT_target>; Store EMU_NRIP to [R4-4/8], push EMU_NRIP     and next nisa PC to dual RSB, subtract 4/8 from r4 and jump to     BT_target. This instruction performs the stack decrement, stack     update (store), DuaIRSB update, and jumps to the BT target.     B) Call Emulation (in-Page, High-Performance Fused Version) -   1. callni 0, <ret_byte_offset>, 0, <BT_target>. This instruction     performs the same sequence (A), but in a single instruction.     C) Call Emulation (Cross-Page, but Small Displacement) -   1. mknripi 0, <ret_byte_offset>. This instruction updates EMU_NRIP     using current page and a supplied offset. -   2. calln <target_page_delta>, <BT_target>; as above, plus     EMU_RIP+=(target_page_delta<<LOG_PAGE_SIZE). This instruction     performs the stack decrement, stack update (store), DuaIRSB update,     and jumps to the BT target, _PLUS_ updates upper bits of EMU_RIP to     new page.     D) Call Emulation (Cross-Page, but Small Displacement,     High-Performance Fused Version) -   1. callni <ret_page_delta>, <ret_byte_offset>, <target_page_delta>,     <BT_target>. This instruction implements the same behavior as (C)     above (call emulation), but in a single instruction.     E) Call Emulation (Cross-Page, but Large Displacement) -   1. mknripi 0, <ret_byte_offset>. This instruction updates EMU_NRIP     using current page and a supplied offset. -   2. mkripih <target_page_delta>, 0; EMU_RIP page     number+=target_page_delta. This instruction updates the EMU_RIP     target using a larger immediate -   3. calln 0, <BT_target>. This instruction performs the stack     decrement, stack update (store), DuaIRSB update, and jumps to the BT     target, EMU_RIP update already performed by mkripih instruction. A     fused version may also be used, given a large instruction with     adequate immediate encodings.

Note that, in one embodiment, the first instruction after a call emulation is always a CMIT/XCATNE in order to check translation consistency/assumptions upon a successful return.

In one embodiment, for return emulation, a Ret instruction pops the stack, pops the RSB, updates the EMU_RIP using the popped stack value, and performs a dual RSB check to determine if the binary translated (BT)-target can be used or not. For example, in one embodiment, if the dual RSB matches, then the BT-target is used. Otherwise the instruction jumps to the BT system's run-time. Note that, in one embodiment, the BT target is always equal to the address of a CMIT/XCATNE instruction.

Context Changes

Note that while the context examples provided below are unique to an x86 architecture, the underlying principles of the invention may be implemented on alternate architectures. In such cases, the context “data” would be slightly different to account for the pieces of information that matter for that ISA, while the underlying principles of the invention would remain the same. In one embodiment, context is comprised of the following:

-   -   CS_LIMIT already exists in the branch address calculation (BAC),         as the branch prediction unit (BPU) needs to check for code         segment violations. Since nISA mode does not modify the         CS_LIMIT, the copy that exists in the BPU is maintained only by         the native x86 mode. As such, it does not need to be restored in         cases of rollbacks. Thus, in one embodiment, any nISA call will         keep a copy of it in the XRSB 1302. On returns, comparison logic         1350 shown in FIG. 13A checks the CS_LIMIT of the TOS of the         XRSB 1302 against the copy that exists in the BPU 1303, as part         of the context check.     -   In one embodiment, a check is also performed to determine         whether the values of all the segment registers are the same         between a call and a return. Since this a significant amount of         state, the common case is checked where the base address is zero         and they are “friendly” (see definition of “friendly” below):         -   Big—For CS and SS segment descriptors, whether the O/B bit             is set;         -   Mode—L-bit for CS segment (32/64 bit mode);         -   Friendly—For CS, SS, DS, ES segment descriptors, whether the             segment is readable, expand-up, and the segment limit has             its maximum value;         -   Base0—For CS, SS, DS, ES segment descriptors whether the             segment base address is zero.

In one embodiment, a copy of these 11 bits resides in the BAC (not the full contents of the segments). As with the CS_LIMIT, the state of the segment registers is never modified while in nISA mode, so that this state does not need to be saved and restored in case of a rollback. The reason why all these bits need to be in place is to avoid checking for them as part of an IPP check. For a bottomless RSB design all of them may need to be removed to become part of the Inter Page Prologue checks (IPP checks), paying an additional MKRIP for each return crossing a page boundary.

-   -   Finally, privilege violation errors may be checked. This is         readily accomplished as the current privilege can be read         directly from the page that is currently accessed. A tricky         point here is that if Supervisor Mode Execution Protection         (SMEP) is enabled, the privilege bit between a CALL and a RET         has to match (i.e., returning to a user page while in supervisor         mode will cause a context mismatch).

Overall, the state that needs to be captured is 32 bits for the CS_LIMIT and 12 bits for the segment signatures and the privilege bit. Note that for non-flat segments the proposed scheme may not work, but the assumption is that this is a rather infrequent scenario. Making the dual RSB 1205 work for non-flat segments means that the exact address would be needed for the base and limit of all segments. In order to reduce the cost, the XOR associativity may be used to reduce the storage requirements by storing the XOR of all the base addresses and the XOR of all the limits. At return time, XORing all but the base register that needs to be checked with the stored content should provide the base register that we want to check for (i.e., if A=B xor C, then A xor C is equal to B). Other schemes are also possible, but this complexity is not necessary.

Reacting to Context Changes

Any context mismatch between a point where a call is performed and the corresponding return will result in invalidating the corresponding dual RSB 1205 entry and re-directing to the software dual RSB (e.g., similar to an address misprediction). However, context changes between call and returns are rare events.

Basic Recovery

In the simplest form, it is assumed that only the TOS needs to be recovered. More specifically, in one embodiment, the TOS is recovered as follows:

-   -   Nuke: With at retire top of stack (TOS)     -   JEClear: TOS recovery from the jedata at exec time.     -   BAClear (non-call/ret instructions): Recover the staged version         of the TOS on baclear

One difference with the traditional recovery scheme is that the address to which the frontend is redirected in case of a misprediction is that of the software dual RSB handler, and not the one read from the register. In one embodiment, the address of the handler is set by the BT at boot using a control register write. In order to select whether the re-directed address will come from the normal source or this control register, two gates may be added to the path re-directing the front-end.

Recovering from Rollbacks

In order to support correct atomic operation, a copy of the retirement TOS is maintained on every commit instruction. In case of a rollback, the TOS of the last commit is written to the retirement copy of the TOS and that is, in turn, written back to the TOS pointers at the BAC and NIP. In order to simplify the handling of the rollbacks and the commits, the BT has to guarantee that the commit and rollback instructions are at least three nISA ops apart from any call and return instruction.

Avoiding Overflows

In the example given above, overflows are possible due to wrong path events. Supporting a retirement dual RSB scheme resolves this issue by copying both the TOS and the values of the retirement dual RSB.

In the foregoing specification, the embodiments of invention have been described with reference to specific exemplary embodiments thereof. It will, however, be evident that various modifications and changes may be made thereto without departing from the broader spirit and scope of the invention as set forth in the appended claims. The specification and drawings are, accordingly, to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense.

Embodiments of the invention may include various steps, which have been described above. The steps may be embodied in machine-executable instructions which may be used to cause a general-purpose or special-purpose processor to perform the steps. Alternatively, these steps may be performed by specific hardware components that contain hardwired logic for performing the steps, or by any combination of programmed computer components and custom hardware components.

As described herein, instructions may refer to specific configurations of hardware such as application specific integrated circuits (ASICs) configured to perform certain operations or having a predetermined functionality or software instructions stored in memory embodied in a non-transitory computer readable medium. Thus, the techniques shown in the Figures can be implemented using code and data stored and executed on one or more electronic devices (e.g., an end station, a network element, etc.). Such electronic devices store and communicate (internally and/or with other electronic devices over a network) code and data using computer machine-readable media, such as non-transitory computer machine-readable storage media (e.g., magnetic disks; optical disks; random access memory; read only memory; flash memory devices; phase-change memory) and transitory computer machine-readable communication media (e.g., electrical, optical, acoustical or other form of propagated signals—such as carrier waves, infrared signals, digital signals, etc.). In addition, such electronic devices typically include a set of one or more processors coupled to one or more other components, such as one or more storage devices (non-transitory machine-readable storage media), user input/output devices (e.g., a keyboard, a touchscreen, and/or a display), and network connections. The coupling of the set of processors and other components is typically through one or more busses and bridges (also termed as bus controllers). The storage device and signals carrying the network traffic respectively represent one or more machine-readable storage media and machine-readable communication media. Thus, the storage device of a given electronic device typically stores code and/or data for execution on the set of one or more processors of that electronic device. Of course, one or more parts of an embodiment of the invention may be implemented using different combinations of software, firmware, and/or hardware. Throughout this detailed description, for the purposes of explanation, numerous specific details were set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. It will be apparent, however, to one skilled in the art that the invention may be practiced without some of these specific details. In certain instances, well known structures and functions were not described in elaborate detail in order to avoid obscuring the subject matter of the present invention. Accordingly, the scope and spirit of the invention should be judged in terms of the claims which follow. 

What is claimed is:
 1. A processor comprising: a dual return stack buffer (RSB) comprising a native RSB and an extended RSB (XRSB), the dual RSB to be used within a binary translation execution environment in which guest call-return instruction sequences are translated to native call-return instruction sequences to be executed directly by the processor; the native RSB to store native return addresses associated with the native call-return instruction sequences; the XRSB to store emulated return addresses associated with the guest call-return instruction sequences, wherein each native return address stored in the RSB is associated with an emulated return address stored in the XRSB; and the binary translation execution environment is configured to detect when a system memory page boundary is crossed between a call instruction and a return instruction, wherein the binary translation execution environment is to responsively insert an instruction to update the emulated return address in the XRSB if the system memory page boundary is crossed.
 2. The processor as in claim 1 wherein, in response to execution by the processor of a call instruction, a native return address is to be stored to the native RSB and a corresponding emulated return address is to be stored to the XRSB.
 3. The processor as in claim 2 wherein in response to execution of a return instruction, the emulated return address is read from the XRSB to determine a return point for execution within an emulated instruction sequence.
 4. The processor as in claim 3 further comprising: comparison logic to ensure that the emulated return address stored in the XRSB matches an expected value for the return address.
 5. The processor as in claim 4 wherein if the emulated return address stored in the XRSB does not match the expected value for the return address an interrupt or trap is generated and handed off to the binary translation execution environment to determine a correct emulated address from which to resume execution.
 6. The processor as in claim 1 wherein the dual RSB comprises a mode bit to indicate whether the XRSB is in use.
 7. The processor as in claim 6 wherein the mode bit is set to a first value when binary translation is implemented and to a second value when binary translation is not being implemented, wherein the mode bit indicates that the XRSB is in use when set to the first value and indicates that the XRSB is not in use when set to the second value.
 8. The processor as in claim 1 wherein the XRSB comprises one read-write port and 16 emulated return address entries.
 9. The processor as in claim 1 wherein the updated emulated return address triggers an access to an instruction translation lookaside buffer (iTLB), resulting in an emulated physical address.
 10. The processor as in claim 9 wherein the emulated physical address is compared against an assumed physical address for a translation associated with the return address and wherein, if the addresses match, a bit is set to indicate that the emulated physical address is correct.
 11. A method comprising: providing a dual return stack buffer (RSB) comprising a native RSB and an extended RSB (XRSB), the dual RSB to be used within a binary translation execution environment in which guest call-return instruction sequences are translated to native call-return instruction sequences to be executed directly by the processor; storing native return addresses associated with the native call-return instruction sequences within the native RSB; responsively storing emulated return addresses associated with the guest call-return instruction sequences within the XRSB, wherein each native return address stored in the RSB is associated with an emulated return address stored in the XRSB; and detecting when a system memory page boundary is crossed between a call instruction and a return instruction and responsively inserting an instruction to update the emulated return address in the XRSB if the system memory page boundary is crossed.
 12. The method as in claim 11 wherein, in response to execution by the processor of a call instruction, a native return address is to be stored to the native RSB and a corresponding emulated return address is to be stored to the XRSB.
 13. The method as in claim 12 wherein in response to execution of a return instruction, the emulated return address is read from the XRSB to determine a return point for execution within an emulated instruction sequence.
 14. The method as in claim 13 further comprising: ensuring that the emulated return address stored in the XRSB matches an expected value for the return address.
 15. The method as in claim 14 wherein if the emulated return address stored in the XRSB does not match the expected value for the return address an interrupt or trap is generated and handed off to the binary translation execution environment to determine a correct emulated address from which to resume execution.
 16. The method as in claim 11 wherein the dual RSB comprises a mode bit to indicate whether the XRSB is in use.
 17. The method as in claim 16 wherein the mode bit is set to a first value when binary translation is implemented and to a second value when binary translation is not being implemented, wherein the mode bit indicates that the XRSB is in use when set to the first value and indicates that the XRSB is not in use when set to the second value.
 18. The method as in claim 11 wherein the XRSB comprises one read-write port and 16 emulated return address entries.
 19. The method as in claim 11 wherein the updated emulated return address triggers an access to an instruction translation lookaside buffer (iTLB), resulting in an emulated physical address.
 20. The method as in claim 19 wherein the emulated physical address is compared against an assumed physical address for a translation associated with the return address and wherein, if the addresses match, a bit is set to indicate that the emulated physical address is correct. 